tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14933009.post2276494759832899520..comments2023-07-23T06:41:28.280-04:00Comments on metalepsis: Daily Zizek: on the sacredness of questioningmetalepsishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09577501652263855291noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14933009.post-82299725331406549212009-12-25T01:52:20.922-05:002009-12-25T01:52:20.922-05:00Thanks for sharing, your blog is worth reading, ni...Thanks for sharing, your blog is worth reading, nice post. Keep it up.Essayhttp://www.qualitycustomessays.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14933009.post-69585964252899951592009-12-02T09:12:59.441-05:002009-12-02T09:12:59.441-05:00See:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20729191/20557629-...See:<br /><br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/20729191/20557629-Zizek-on-Belief<br /><br />pg 144.metalepsishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09577501652263855291noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14933009.post-15452319118607789742009-12-02T09:09:59.733-05:002009-12-02T09:09:59.733-05:00yea it should probably read:
tendentially [sic!...yea it should probably read: <br /><br />tendentially [sic! tendentiously?]<br /><br />tendentially being Zizek's coinage..?metalepsishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09577501652263855291noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14933009.post-72210267400038947262009-12-02T08:42:12.339-05:002009-12-02T08:42:12.339-05:00What work is getting done with the punctuation in ...What work is getting done with the punctuation in “tendenti[ous]ly”? Is that an editorial [ous], or a pun that’s eluding me, or what? I can’t figure out what the word would be without the bracketed letters (“tendentily”?). I’m not questioning Žižek’s ascription of tendentiousness to Christian universalism, just trying to puzzle out the brackets.AKMAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16776029549322473374noreply@blogger.com